This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
The Rehabilitation Professional
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Book Reviews
    • Content Expertise
    • Editorial Essays
    • Empirical Research
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Journal Advertisers
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:41167/feed
P-ISSN 2328-6202
E-ISSN 2833-2466
Empirical Research
Vol. 19, Issue 4, 2011October 01, 2011 CDT

The Ethical Implications for Insurance Rehabilitation Practitioners

Jon Christenson,
Copyright Logoccby-nc-nd-4.0 • https://doi.org/10.70385/001c.146818
Photo by fabio on Unsplash

Articles in Vol. 19, Issue 4, 2011

Vol. 19, Issue 4, 2011
  • The Ethical Implications for Insurance Rehabilitation Practitioners
    Jon Christenson
  • The Vocational and Rehabilitation Assessment Model (VRAM): Introduction of an Empirically Derived Model of Forensic Vocational and Rehabilitation Assessment
    Rick RobinsonJamie Pomeranz
  • Vocational Rehabilitation Response to the Horizon Disaster 3: Public-Sector Initiatives, Post-Disaster Employment Trends, and Re-Evaluation of Wage-Loss Methodologies
    Robert M. WhatleyTheodore S. SmithKathleen R. CeaserStacy B. Charles
  • Federal Rule 702: What Is the Meaning and Implications of This Rule for the Forensic Rehabilitation Consultant
    Timothy F. Field
The Rehabilitation Professional
Christenson, J. (2011). The Ethical Implications for Insurance Rehabilitation Practitioners. The Rehabilitation Professional, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.70385/001c.146818
Save article as...▾

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system